Currently we don't really have anything that stops us from deleting
state groups when an in-flight event references it. This is a fairly
rare race currently, but we want to be able to more aggressively delete
state groups so it is important to address this to ensure that the
database remains valid.
This implements the locking, but doesn't actually use it.
See the class docstring of the new data store for an explanation for how
this works.
---------
Co-authored-by: Devon Hudson <devon.dmytro@gmail.com>
This also happens for rejecting an invite. Basically, any out-of-band membership transition where we first get the membership as an `outlier` and then rely on federation filling us in to de-outlier it.
This PR mainly addresses automated test flakiness, bots/scripts, and options within Synapse like [`auto_accept_invites`](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/v1.122/usage/configuration/config_documentation.html#auto_accept_invites) that are able to react quickly (before federation is able to push us events), but also helps in generic scenarios where federation is lagging.
I initially thought this might be a Synapse consistency issue (see issues labeled with [`Z-Read-After-Write`](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/labels/Z-Read-After-Write)) but it seems to be an event auth logic problem. Workers probably do increase the number of possible race condition scenarios that make this visible though (replication and cache invalidation lag).
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012
(probably fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/15012 (https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012))
Related to https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/2062
Problems:
1. We don't consider [out-of-band membership](https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/blob/develop/docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md#out-of-band-membership-events) (outliers) in our `event_auth` logic even though we expose them in `/sync`.
1. (This PR doesn't address this point) Perhaps we should consider authing events in the persistence queue as events already in the queue could allow subsequent events to be allowed (events come through many channels: federation transaction, remote invite, remote join, local send). But this doesn't save us in the case where the event is more delayed over federation.
### What happened before?
I wrote some Complement test that stresses this exact scenario and reproduces the problem: https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/757
```
COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh -run TestSynapseConsistency
```
We have `hs1` and `hs2` running in monolith mode (no workers):
1. `@charlie1:hs2` is invited and joins the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie1:hs2` to a room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. `@charlie1:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2` is not yet in the room, this happens as a remote join `make_join`/`send_join` which comes back with all of the auth events needed to auth successfully and now `@charlie1:hs2` is successfully joined to the room.
1. `@charlie2:hs2` is invited and and tries to join the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie2:hs2` to the room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. Because `hs2` is already participating in the room, we also see the invite come over federation in a transaction and we start processing it (not done yet, see below)
1. `@charlie2:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2`, is already in the room, this happens as a local join but we deny the event because our `event_auth` logic thinks that we have no membership in the room ❌ (expected to be able to join because we saw the invite down `/sync`)
1. We finally finish processing the `@charlie2:hs2` invite event from and de-outlier it.
- If this finished before we tried to join we would have been fine but this is the race condition that makes this situation visible.
Logs for `hs2`:
```
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🧲 do_invite_join for @user-2-charlie1:hs2 in !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$bwv8LxFnqfpsw_rhR7OrTjtz09gaJ23MqstKOcs7ygA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-1-alice:hs1, membership=join, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
...
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📬 handling received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
📮 handle_new_client_event: handling <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
❌ Denying new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False> because 403: You are not invited to this room.
synapse.http.server - 130 - INFO - POST-16 - <SynapseRequest at 0x7f460c91fbf0 method='POST' uri='/_matrix/client/v3/join/%21sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1?server_name=hs1' clientproto='HTTP/1.0' site='8080'> SynapseError: 403 - You are not invited to this room.
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
✅ handled received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
```
Reset `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` -> `forgotten` status when
membership changes (like rejoining a room).
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17781
### What was the problem before?
Previously, if someone used `/forget` on one of their rooms, it would
update `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` as expected but when someone
rejoined the room (or had any membership change), the upsert didn't
overwrite and reset the `forgotten` status so it remained `forgotten`
and invisible down the Sliding Sync endpoint.
During the migration the automated script to update the copyright
headers accidentally got rid of some of the existing copyright lines.
Reinstate them.
Also add restore of purge/shutdown rooms after a synapse restart.
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <erice@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erikj@matrix.org>
Allow configuring the set of workers to proxy outbound federation traffic through (`outbound_federation_restricted_to`).
This is useful when you have a worker setup with `federation_sender` instances responsible for sending outbound federation requests and want to make sure *all* outbound federation traffic goes through those instances. Before this change, the generic workers would still contact federation themselves for things like profile lookups, backfill, etc. This PR allows you to set more strict access controls/firewall for all workers and only allow the `federation_sender`'s to contact the outside world.
Allow configuring the set of workers to proxy outbound federation traffic through (`outbound_federation_restricted_to`).
This is useful when you have a worker setup with `federation_sender` instances responsible for sending outbound federation requests and want to make sure *all* outbound federation traffic goes through those instances. Before this change, the generic workers would still contact federation themselves for things like profile lookups, backfill, etc. This PR allows you to set more strict access controls/firewall for all workers and only allow the `federation_sender`'s to contact the outside world.
The original code is from @erikjohnston's branches which I've gotten in-shape to merge.
* Check required power levels earlier in createRoom handler.
- If a server was configured to reject the creation of rooms with E2EE
enabled (by specifying an unattainably high power level for
"m.room.encryption" in default_power_level_content_override), the 403
error was not being triggered until after the room was created and
before the "m.room.power_levels" was sent. This allowed a user to
access the partially-configured room and complete the setup of E2EE
and power levels manually.
- This change causes the power level overrides to be checked earlier and
the request to be rejected before the user gains access to the room.
- A new `_validate_room_config` method is added to contain checks that
should be run before a room is created.
- The new test case confirms that a user request is rejected by the new
validation method.
Signed-off-by: Grant McLean <grant@catalyst.net.nz>
* Add a changelog file.
* Formatting fix for black.
* Remove unneeded line from test.
---------
Signed-off-by: Grant McLean <grant@catalyst.net.nz>
* Allow `AbstractSet` in `StrCollection`
Or else frozensets are excluded. This will be useful in an upcoming
commit where I plan to change a function that accepts `List[str]` to
accept `StrCollection` instead.
* `rooms_to_exclude` -> `rooms_to_exclude_globally`
I am about to make use of this exclusion mechanism to exclude rooms for
a specific user and a specific sync. This rename helps to clarify the
distinction between the global config and the rooms to exclude for a
specific sync.
* Better function names for internal sync methods
* Track a list of excluded rooms on SyncResultBuilder
I plan to feed a list of partially stated rooms for this sync to ignore
* Exclude partial state rooms during eager sync
using the mechanism established in the previous commit
* Track un-partial-state stream in sync tokens
So that we can work out which rooms have become fully-stated during a
given sync period.
* Fix mutation of `@cached` return value
This was fouling up a complement test added alongside this PR.
Excluding a room would mean the set of forgotten rooms in the cache
would be extended. This means that room could be erroneously considered
forgotten in the future.
Introduced in #12310, Synapse 1.57.0. I don't think this had any
user-visible side effects (until now).
* SyncResultBuilder: track rooms to force as newly joined
Similar plan as before. We've omitted rooms from certain sync responses;
now we establish the mechanism to reintroduce them into future syncs.
* Read new field, to present rooms as newly joined
* Force un-partial-stated rooms to be newly-joined
for eager incremental syncs only, provided they're still fully stated
* Notify user stream listeners to wake up long polling syncs
* Changelog
* Typo fix
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
* Unnecessary list cast
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
* Rephrase comment
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
* Another comment
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fixup merge(?)
* Poke notifier when receiving un-partial-stated msg over replication
* Fixup merge whoops
Thanks MV :)
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Velen <mathieuv@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Velten <mathieuv@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Sean Quah <8349537+squahtx@users.noreply.github.com>
* Introduce a test for the old behaviour which we want to restore
* Reintroduce the old behaviour in a simpler way
* Newsfile
Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <oliverw@matrix.org>
* Use 1 credit instead of 2 for creating a room: be more lenient than before
Notably, the UI in Element Web was still broken after restoring to prior behaviour.
After discussion, we agreed that it would be sensible to increase the limit.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Wilkinson (reivilibre) <oliverw@matrix.org>
Fix MSC3030 `/timestamp_to_event` endpoint returning `outliers` that it has no idea whether are near a gap or not (and therefore unable to determine whether it's actually the closest event). The reason Synapse doesn't know whether an `outlier` is next to a gap is because our gap checks rely on entries in the `event_edges`, `event_forward_extremeties`, and `event_backward_extremities` tables which is [not the case for `outliers`](2c63cdcc3f/docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md (outliers)).
Also fixes MSC3030 Complement `can_paginate_after_getting_remote_event_from_timestamp_to_event_endpoint` test flake. Although this acted flakey in Complement, if `sync_partial_state` raced and beat us before `/timestamp_to_event`, then even if we retried the failing `/context` request it wouldn't work until we made this Synapse change. With this PR, Synapse will never return an `outlier` event so that test will always go and ask over federation.
Fix https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13944
### Why did this fail before? Why was it flakey?
Sleuthing the server logs on the [CI failure](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/actions/runs/3149623842/jobs/5121449357#step:5:5805), it looks like `hs2:/timestamp_to_event` found `$NP6-oU7mIFVyhtKfGvfrEQX949hQX-T-gvuauG6eurU` as an `outlier` event locally. Then when we went and asked for it via `/context`, since it's an `outlier`, it was filtered out of the results -> `You don't have permission to access that event.`
This is reproducible when `sync_partial_state` races and persists `$NP6-oU7mIFVyhtKfGvfrEQX949hQX-T-gvuauG6eurU` as an `outlier` before we evaluate `get_event_for_timestamp(...)`. To consistently reproduce locally, just add a delay at the [start of `get_event_for_timestamp(...)`](cb20b885cb/synapse/handlers/room.py (L1470-L1496)) so it always runs after `sync_partial_state` completes.
```py
from twisted.internet import task as twisted_task
d = twisted_task.deferLater(self.hs.get_reactor(), 3.5)
await d
```
In a run where it passes, on `hs2`, `get_event_for_timestamp(...)` finds a different event locally which is next to a gap and we request from a closer one from `hs1` which gets backfilled. And since the backfilled event is not an `outlier`, it's returned as expected during `/context`.
With this PR, Synapse will never return an `outlier` event so that test will always go and ask over federation.
Fixes two related bugs:
* The handling of `[null]` for a `room_types` filter was incorrect.
* The ordering of arguments when providing both a network tuple
and room type field was incorrect.
MSC3316 declares that both /rooms/{roomId}/send and /rooms/{roomId}/state
should accept a ts parameter for appservices. This change expands support
to /state and adds tests.
This PR begins work on batching up events during the creation of a room. The PR splits out the creation and sending/persisting of the events. The first three events in the creation of the room-creating the room, joining the creator to the room, and the power levels event are sent sequentially, while the subsequent events are created and collected to be sent at the end of the function. This is currently done by appending them to a list and then iterating over the list to send, the next step (after this PR) would be to send and persist the collected events as a batch.
Inspired by the room batch handler, this uses previous event inserts to
pre-populate prev events during room creation, reducing the number of
queries required to create a room.
Signed off by Nick @ Beeper (@Fizzadar)
