Some small cleanups after Python3.8 became EOL.
- Move some type imports from `typing_extensions` to `typing`
- Remove the `abi3-py38` feature from pyo3
### Pull Request Checklist
<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->
* [x] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [x] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
- Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
- End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
- Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [x] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))
---------
Co-authored-by: Quentin Gliech <quenting@element.io>
Regressed as part of https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/18107
This does two things:
1. Only check if the state groups have been deleted when calculating the
event context (as that's when we will insert them). This avoids lots of
checks for read operations.
2. Don't lock the `state_groups` rows when doing the check. This adds
overhead, and it doesn't prevent any races.
Currently we don't really have anything that stops us from deleting
state groups when an in-flight event references it. This is a fairly
rare race currently, but we want to be able to more aggressively delete
state groups so it is important to address this to ensure that the
database remains valid.
This implements the locking, but doesn't actually use it.
See the class docstring of the new data store for an explanation for how
this works.
---------
Co-authored-by: Devon Hudson <devon.dmytro@gmail.com>
This also happens for rejecting an invite. Basically, any out-of-band membership transition where we first get the membership as an `outlier` and then rely on federation filling us in to de-outlier it.
This PR mainly addresses automated test flakiness, bots/scripts, and options within Synapse like [`auto_accept_invites`](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/v1.122/usage/configuration/config_documentation.html#auto_accept_invites) that are able to react quickly (before federation is able to push us events), but also helps in generic scenarios where federation is lagging.
I initially thought this might be a Synapse consistency issue (see issues labeled with [`Z-Read-After-Write`](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/labels/Z-Read-After-Write)) but it seems to be an event auth logic problem. Workers probably do increase the number of possible race condition scenarios that make this visible though (replication and cache invalidation lag).
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012
(probably fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/15012 (https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012))
Related to https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/2062
Problems:
1. We don't consider [out-of-band membership](https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/blob/develop/docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md#out-of-band-membership-events) (outliers) in our `event_auth` logic even though we expose them in `/sync`.
1. (This PR doesn't address this point) Perhaps we should consider authing events in the persistence queue as events already in the queue could allow subsequent events to be allowed (events come through many channels: federation transaction, remote invite, remote join, local send). But this doesn't save us in the case where the event is more delayed over federation.
### What happened before?
I wrote some Complement test that stresses this exact scenario and reproduces the problem: https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/757
```
COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh -run TestSynapseConsistency
```
We have `hs1` and `hs2` running in monolith mode (no workers):
1. `@charlie1:hs2` is invited and joins the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie1:hs2` to a room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. `@charlie1:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2` is not yet in the room, this happens as a remote join `make_join`/`send_join` which comes back with all of the auth events needed to auth successfully and now `@charlie1:hs2` is successfully joined to the room.
1. `@charlie2:hs2` is invited and and tries to join the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie2:hs2` to the room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. Because `hs2` is already participating in the room, we also see the invite come over federation in a transaction and we start processing it (not done yet, see below)
1. `@charlie2:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2`, is already in the room, this happens as a local join but we deny the event because our `event_auth` logic thinks that we have no membership in the room ❌ (expected to be able to join because we saw the invite down `/sync`)
1. We finally finish processing the `@charlie2:hs2` invite event from and de-outlier it.
- If this finished before we tried to join we would have been fine but this is the race condition that makes this situation visible.
Logs for `hs2`:
```
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🧲 do_invite_join for @user-2-charlie1:hs2 in !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$bwv8LxFnqfpsw_rhR7OrTjtz09gaJ23MqstKOcs7ygA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-1-alice:hs1, membership=join, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
...
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📬 handling received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
📮 handle_new_client_event: handling <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
❌ Denying new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False> because 403: You are not invited to this room.
synapse.http.server - 130 - INFO - POST-16 - <SynapseRequest at 0x7f460c91fbf0 method='POST' uri='/_matrix/client/v3/join/%21sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1?server_name=hs1' clientproto='HTTP/1.0' site='8080'> SynapseError: 403 - You are not invited to this room.
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
✅ handled received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
```
This is particularly a problem in a state reset scenario where the membership
might change without a corresponding event.
This PR is targeting a scenario where a state reset happens which causes
room membership to change. Previously, the cache would just hold onto
stale data and now we properly bust the cache in this scenario.
We have a few tests for these scenarios which you can see are now fixed
because we can remove the `FIXME` where we were previously manually
busting the cache in the test itself.
This is a general Synapse thing so by it's nature it helps out Sliding
Sync.
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17368
Prerequisite for https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17929
---
Match when are busting `_curr_state_delta_stream_cache`
This is an implementation of MSC4190, which allows appservices to manage
their user's devices without /login & /logout.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Morgan <1342360+anoadragon453@users.noreply.github.com>
Reset `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` -> `forgotten` status when
membership changes (like rejoining a room).
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17781
### What was the problem before?
Previously, if someone used `/forget` on one of their rooms, it would
update `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` as expected but when someone
rejoined the room (or had any membership change), the upsert didn't
overwrite and reset the `forgotten` status so it remained `forgotten`
and invisible down the Sliding Sync endpoint.
Fixes https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17698
This handles `required_state` changes by checking if new state has been
added to the config, and if so fetching and returning that from the
current state.
This also takes care to ensure that given a state entry S that is added,
removed and then re-added that we do *not* send S down a second time if
there have been no changes to S in the current state. This is fine for
Rust SDK (as it just remembers all state), but we might decide not to do
this behaviour in the MSC. If we decide to always send down S then its
easy enough to rip out all the code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
The notifier is quite inefficient when it has to wake up many user
streams all at once
From a silly benchmark this takes the time to notify 1M user streams
from ~30s to ~5s
This is basically exactly the same logic as for receipts. Essentially we
just need to track which room account data we have and haven't sent down
to clients, and use that when we pull stuff out.
I think this just needs a couple of extra tests written
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
Performance optimization: We can avoid fetching rooms that the user has
left themselves (which could be a significant amount), then only add
back rooms that the user has `newly_left` (left in the token range of an
incremental sync). It's a lot faster to fetch less rooms than fetch them
all and throw them away in most cases. Since the user only leaves a room
(or is state reset out) once in a blue moon, we can avoid a lot of work.
Based on @erikjohnston's branch, erikj/ss_perf
---------
Co-authored-by: Erik Johnston <erik@matrix.org>
No need to sort if the range is large enough to cover all of the rooms
in the list. Previously, we would only do this optimization if the range
was exactly large enough.
Follow-up to https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17672
This appears to be enough to make Element Web work (or at least move it
on to the next hurdle)
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
Move filters tests to rest layer in order to test the new (with sliding
sync tables) and fallback paths that Sliding Sync can use.
Also found a bug in the new path because it's not being tested which is
also fixed in this PR. We now take into account `has_known_state` when
filtering.
Spawning from
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17662#discussion_r1755574791.
This should have been done when we started using the new sliding sync
tables in https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17630
This PR changes `from pydantic import BaseModel` to `from
synapse._pydantic_compat import BaseModel` (as well as `constr`,
`conbytes`, `conint`, `confloat`).
It allows `check_pydantic_models.py` to mock those pydantic objects only
in the synapse module, and not interfere with pydantic objects in
external dependencies.
This should solve the CI problems for #17144, which breaks because
`check_pydantic_models.py` patches pydantic models from
[scim2-models](https://scim2-models.readthedocs.io/).
/cc @DMRobertson @gotmax23
fixes#17659
### Pull Request Checklist
<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->
* [x] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [x] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
- Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
- End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
- Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [x] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))
We need to bust the `get_sliding_sync_rooms_for_user`
cache when the room encryption is updated and any
other field that is used in the query.
Follow-up to https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17630
- Bust cache for membership change (cross-reference
`get_rooms_for_user`)
- Bust cache for room `encryption` (cross-reference
`get_room_encryption`)
- Bust cache for `forgotten` (cross-reference
`did_forget`/`get_forgotten_rooms_for_user`)
For rooms with a name we can skip fetching a full room summary, as we
don't need to calculate heroes, and instead just fetch the room counts
directly.
This also changes things to not return counts and heroes for non-joined
rooms. For left/banned rooms we were returning zero values anyway, and
for invite/knock rooms we don't really want to leak such information
(even if some of is included in the stripped state).
Speed up incremental sync by avoiding extra work. We first look at the
state delta changes and only fetch and calculate further derived things
if they have changed.
I thought ruff check would also format, but it doesn't.
This runs ruff format in CI and dev scripts. The first commit is just a
run of `ruff format .` in the root directory.
