Currently we don't really have anything that stops us from deleting
state groups when an in-flight event references it. This is a fairly
rare race currently, but we want to be able to more aggressively delete
state groups so it is important to address this to ensure that the
database remains valid.
This implements the locking, but doesn't actually use it.
See the class docstring of the new data store for an explanation for how
this works.
---------
Co-authored-by: Devon Hudson <devon.dmytro@gmail.com>
This also happens for rejecting an invite. Basically, any out-of-band membership transition where we first get the membership as an `outlier` and then rely on federation filling us in to de-outlier it.
This PR mainly addresses automated test flakiness, bots/scripts, and options within Synapse like [`auto_accept_invites`](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/v1.122/usage/configuration/config_documentation.html#auto_accept_invites) that are able to react quickly (before federation is able to push us events), but also helps in generic scenarios where federation is lagging.
I initially thought this might be a Synapse consistency issue (see issues labeled with [`Z-Read-After-Write`](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/labels/Z-Read-After-Write)) but it seems to be an event auth logic problem. Workers probably do increase the number of possible race condition scenarios that make this visible though (replication and cache invalidation lag).
Fix https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012
(probably fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/15012 (https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/15012))
Related to https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/issues/2062
Problems:
1. We don't consider [out-of-band membership](https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/blob/develop/docs/development/room-dag-concepts.md#out-of-band-membership-events) (outliers) in our `event_auth` logic even though we expose them in `/sync`.
1. (This PR doesn't address this point) Perhaps we should consider authing events in the persistence queue as events already in the queue could allow subsequent events to be allowed (events come through many channels: federation transaction, remote invite, remote join, local send). But this doesn't save us in the case where the event is more delayed over federation.
### What happened before?
I wrote some Complement test that stresses this exact scenario and reproduces the problem: https://github.com/matrix-org/complement/pull/757
```
COMPLEMENT_ALWAYS_PRINT_SERVER_LOGS=1 COMPLEMENT_DIR=../complement ./scripts-dev/complement.sh -run TestSynapseConsistency
```
We have `hs1` and `hs2` running in monolith mode (no workers):
1. `@charlie1:hs2` is invited and joins the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie1:hs2` to a room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. `@charlie1:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2` is not yet in the room, this happens as a remote join `make_join`/`send_join` which comes back with all of the auth events needed to auth successfully and now `@charlie1:hs2` is successfully joined to the room.
1. `@charlie2:hs2` is invited and and tries to join the room:
1. `hs1` invites `@charlie2:hs2` to the room which we receive on `hs2` as `PUT /_matrix/federation/v1/invite/{roomId}/{eventId}` (`on_invite_request(...)`) and the invite membership is persisted as an outlier. The `room_memberships` and `local_current_membership` database tables are also updated which means they are visible down `/sync` at this point.
1. Because `hs2` is already participating in the room, we also see the invite come over federation in a transaction and we start processing it (not done yet, see below)
1. `@charlie2:hs2` decides to join because it saw the invite down `/sync`. Because `hs2`, is already in the room, this happens as a local join but we deny the event because our `event_auth` logic thinks that we have no membership in the room ❌ (expected to be able to join because we saw the invite down `/sync`)
1. We finally finish processing the `@charlie2:hs2` invite event from and de-outlier it.
- If this finished before we tried to join we would have been fine but this is the race condition that makes this situation visible.
Logs for `hs2`:
```
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$PRPCvdXdcqyjdUKP_NxGF2CcukmwOaoK0ZR1WiVOZVk, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🧲 do_invite_join for @user-2-charlie1:hs2 in !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$bwv8LxFnqfpsw_rhR7OrTjtz09gaJ23MqstKOcs7ygA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-1-alice:hs1, membership=join, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$oju1ts3G3pz5O62IesrxX5is4LxAwU3WPr4xvid5ijI, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-2-charlie1:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
...
🗳️ on_invite_request: handling event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update room_memberships: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
🔦 _store_room_members_txn update local_current_membership: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
✅ on_invite_request: handled event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=True>
📬 handling received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
📮 handle_new_client_event: handling <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False>
❌ Denying new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$WNVDTQrxy5tCdPQHMyHyIn7tE4NWqKsZ8Bn8R4WbBSA, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=join, outlier=False> because 403: You are not invited to this room.
synapse.http.server - 130 - INFO - POST-16 - <SynapseRequest at 0x7f460c91fbf0 method='POST' uri='/_matrix/client/v3/join/%21sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1?server_name=hs1' clientproto='HTTP/1.0' site='8080'> SynapseError: 403 - You are not invited to this room.
📨 Notifying about new event <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
✅ handled received PDU in room !sfZVBdLUezpPWetrol:hs1: <FrozenEventV3 event_id=$O_54j7O--6xMsegY5EVZ9SA-mI4_iHJOIoRwYyeWIPY, type=m.room.member, state_key=@user-3-charlie2:hs2, membership=invite, outlier=False>
```
I thought ruff check would also format, but it doesn't.
This runs ruff format in CI and dev scripts. The first commit is just a
run of `ruff format .` in the root directory.
During the migration the automated script to update the copyright
headers accidentally got rid of some of the existing copyright lines.
Reinstate them.
While https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635 stops us from doing the slow thing after we've already done it once, this PR stops us from doing one of the slow things in the first place.
Related to
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13622
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13635
- https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13676
Part of https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/13356
Follow-up to https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/13815 which tracks event signature failures.
With this PR, we avoid the call to the costly `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` because the signature failure will count as an attempt before and we filter events based on the backoff before calling `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` now.
For example, this will save us 156s out of the 185s total that this `matrix.org` `/messages` request. If you want to see the full Jaeger trace of this, you can drag and drop this `trace.json` into your own Jaeger, https://gist.github.com/MadLittleMods/4b12d0d0afe88c2f65ffcc907306b761
To explain this exact scenario around `/messages` -> backfill, we call `/backfill` and first check the signatures of the 100 events. We see bad signature for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` and `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` (both member events). Then we process the 98 events remaining that have valid signatures but one of the events references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event`. So we have to do the whole `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event` rigmarole which pulls in those same events which fail again because the signatures are still invalid.
- `backfill`
- `outgoing-federation-request` `/backfill`
- `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch`
- `_check_sigs_and_hash_and_fetch_one` for each event received over backfill
- ❗ `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)`
- ❗ `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` fails with `Signature on retrieved event was invalid.`: `unable to verify signature for sender domain xxx: 401: Failed to find any key to satisfy: _FetchKeyRequest(...)`
- `_process_pulled_events`
- `_process_pulled_event` for each validated event
- ❗ Event `$Q0iMdqtz3IJYfZQU2Xk2WjB5NDF8Gg8cFSYYyKQgKJ0` references `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` as a `prev_event` which is missing so we try to get it
- `_get_state_ids_after_missing_prev_event`
- `outgoing-federation-request` `/state_ids`
- ❗ `get_pdu` for `$luA4l7QHhf_jadH3mI-AyFqho0U2Q-IXXUbGSMq6h6M` which fails the signature check again
- ❗ `get_pdu` for `$zuOn2Rd2vsC7SUia3Hp3r6JSkSFKcc5j3QTTqW_0jDw` which fails the signature check
Refactor how the `EventContext` class works, with the intention of reducing the amount of state we fetch from the DB during event processing.
The idea here is to get rid of the cached `current_state_ids` and `prev_state_ids` that live in the `EventContext`, and instead defer straight to the database (and its caching).
One change that may have a noticeable effect is that we now no longer prefill the `get_current_state_ids` cache on a state change. However, that query is relatively light, since its just a case of reading a table from the DB (unlike fetching state at an event which is more heavyweight). For deployments with workers this cache isn't even used.
Part of #12684
If we're missing most of the events in the room state, then we may as well call the /state endpoint, instead of individually requesting each and every event.
