mirror of
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse.git
synced 2024-12-14 11:57:44 +00:00
Reject mentions on the C-S API which are invalid. (#15311)
Invalid mentions data received over the Client-Server API should be rejected with a 400 error. This will hopefully stop clients from sending invalid data, although does not help with data received over federation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6af49fbea
commit
68a6717312
4 changed files with 105 additions and 54 deletions
1
changelog.d/15311.misc
Normal file
1
changelog.d/15311.misc
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
Reject events with an invalid "mentions" property pert [MSC3952](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3952).
|
|
@ -12,11 +12,17 @@
|
|||
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||||
# limitations under the License.
|
||||
import collections.abc
|
||||
from typing import Iterable, Type, Union, cast
|
||||
from typing import Iterable, List, Type, Union, cast
|
||||
|
||||
import jsonschema
|
||||
from pydantic import Field, StrictBool, StrictStr
|
||||
|
||||
from synapse.api.constants import MAX_ALIAS_LENGTH, EventTypes, Membership
|
||||
from synapse.api.constants import (
|
||||
MAX_ALIAS_LENGTH,
|
||||
EventContentFields,
|
||||
EventTypes,
|
||||
Membership,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from synapse.api.errors import Codes, SynapseError
|
||||
from synapse.api.room_versions import EventFormatVersions
|
||||
from synapse.config.homeserver import HomeServerConfig
|
||||
|
@ -28,6 +34,8 @@ from synapse.events.utils import (
|
|||
validate_canonicaljson,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from synapse.federation.federation_server import server_matches_acl_event
|
||||
from synapse.http.servlet import validate_json_object
|
||||
from synapse.rest.models import RequestBodyModel
|
||||
from synapse.types import EventID, JsonDict, RoomID, UserID
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -88,27 +96,27 @@ class EventValidator:
|
|||
Codes.INVALID_PARAM,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if event.type == EventTypes.Retention:
|
||||
elif event.type == EventTypes.Retention:
|
||||
self._validate_retention(event)
|
||||
|
||||
if event.type == EventTypes.ServerACL:
|
||||
elif event.type == EventTypes.ServerACL:
|
||||
if not server_matches_acl_event(config.server.server_name, event):
|
||||
raise SynapseError(
|
||||
400, "Can't create an ACL event that denies the local server"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if event.type == EventTypes.PowerLevels:
|
||||
elif event.type == EventTypes.PowerLevels:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
jsonschema.validate(
|
||||
instance=event.content,
|
||||
schema=POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA,
|
||||
cls=plValidator,
|
||||
cls=POWER_LEVELS_VALIDATOR,
|
||||
)
|
||||
except jsonschema.ValidationError as e:
|
||||
if e.path:
|
||||
# example: "users_default": '0' is not of type 'integer'
|
||||
# cast safety: path entries can be integers, if we fail to validate
|
||||
# items in an array. However the POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA doesn't expect
|
||||
# items in an array. However, the POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA doesn't expect
|
||||
# to see any arrays.
|
||||
message = (
|
||||
'"' + cast(str, e.path[-1]) + '": ' + e.message # noqa: B306
|
||||
|
@ -125,6 +133,15 @@ class EventValidator:
|
|||
errcode=Codes.BAD_JSON,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# If the event contains a mentions key, validate it.
|
||||
if (
|
||||
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS in event.content
|
||||
and config.experimental.msc3952_intentional_mentions
|
||||
):
|
||||
validate_json_object(
|
||||
event.content[EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS], Mentions
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _validate_retention(self, event: EventBase) -> None:
|
||||
"""Checks that an event that defines the retention policy for a room respects the
|
||||
format enforced by the spec.
|
||||
|
@ -253,10 +270,15 @@ POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA = {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Mentions(RequestBodyModel):
|
||||
user_ids: List[StrictStr] = Field(default_factory=list)
|
||||
room: StrictBool = False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# This could return something newer than Draft 7, but that's the current "latest"
|
||||
# validator.
|
||||
def _create_power_level_validator() -> Type[jsonschema.Draft7Validator]:
|
||||
validator = jsonschema.validators.validator_for(POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA)
|
||||
def _create_validator(schema: JsonDict) -> Type[jsonschema.Draft7Validator]:
|
||||
validator = jsonschema.validators.validator_for(schema)
|
||||
|
||||
# by default jsonschema does not consider a immutabledict to be an object so
|
||||
# we need to use a custom type checker
|
||||
|
@ -268,4 +290,4 @@ def _create_power_level_validator() -> Type[jsonschema.Draft7Validator]:
|
|||
return jsonschema.validators.extend(validator, type_checker=type_checker)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
plValidator = _create_power_level_validator()
|
||||
POWER_LEVELS_VALIDATOR = _create_validator(POWER_LEVELS_SCHEMA)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -778,17 +778,13 @@ def parse_json_object_from_request(
|
|||
Model = TypeVar("Model", bound=BaseModel)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parse_and_validate_json_object_from_request(
|
||||
request: Request, model_type: Type[Model]
|
||||
) -> Model:
|
||||
"""Parse a JSON object from the body of a twisted HTTP request, then deserialise and
|
||||
validate using the given pydantic model.
|
||||
def validate_json_object(content: JsonDict, model_type: Type[Model]) -> Model:
|
||||
"""Validate a deserialized JSON object using the given pydantic model.
|
||||
|
||||
Raises:
|
||||
SynapseError if the request body couldn't be decoded as JSON or
|
||||
if it wasn't a JSON object.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
content = parse_json_object_from_request(request, allow_empty_body=False)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
instance = model_type.parse_obj(content)
|
||||
except ValidationError as e:
|
||||
|
@ -811,6 +807,20 @@ def parse_and_validate_json_object_from_request(
|
|||
return instance
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def parse_and_validate_json_object_from_request(
|
||||
request: Request, model_type: Type[Model]
|
||||
) -> Model:
|
||||
"""Parse a JSON object from the body of a twisted HTTP request, then deserialise and
|
||||
validate using the given pydantic model.
|
||||
|
||||
Raises:
|
||||
SynapseError if the request body couldn't be decoded as JSON or
|
||||
if it wasn't a JSON object.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
content = parse_json_object_from_request(request, allow_empty_body=False)
|
||||
return validate_json_object(content, model_type)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def assert_params_in_dict(body: JsonDict, required: Iterable[str]) -> None:
|
||||
absent = []
|
||||
for k in required:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -243,22 +243,28 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Non-dict mentions should be ignored.
|
||||
mentions: Any
|
||||
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", []):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: mentions}
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Avoid C-S validation as these aren't expected.
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"synapse.events.validator.EventValidator.validate_new",
|
||||
new=lambda s, event, config: True,
|
||||
):
|
||||
mentions: Any
|
||||
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", []):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: mentions}
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# A non-list should be ignored.
|
||||
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", {}):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": mentions}},
|
||||
# A non-list should be ignored.
|
||||
for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", {}):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": mentions}},
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the list should notify.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
|
@ -291,26 +297,32 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Invalid entries in the list are ignored.
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{
|
||||
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
|
||||
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Avoid C-S validation as these aren't expected.
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"synapse.events.validator.EventValidator.validate_new",
|
||||
new=lambda s, event, config: True,
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{
|
||||
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
|
||||
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{
|
||||
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
|
||||
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{
|
||||
EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {
|
||||
"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
|
@ -351,14 +363,20 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase):
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Invalid data should not notify.
|
||||
mentions: Any
|
||||
for mentions in (None, False, 1, "foo", [], {}):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": mentions}},
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Avoid C-S validation as these aren't expected.
|
||||
with patch(
|
||||
"synapse.events.validator.EventValidator.validate_new",
|
||||
new=lambda s, event, config: True,
|
||||
):
|
||||
mentions: Any
|
||||
for mentions in (None, False, 1, "foo", [], {}):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
self._create_and_process(
|
||||
bulk_evaluator,
|
||||
{EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": mentions}},
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists.
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue